So, MysticJuicer has been working effortlessly with this for YEARS now. So, how does the stats work out with our understanding of the game?
Especially I was surprised by the perceived top tiers
Zane
![]()
Troq
![]()
Geiger
![]()
DeGrey
![]()
All of them have negative win/loss results.
On the other hand, two of the perceived worst characters are the highest numbers on the list.
Jaina
![]()
Persephone
![]()
How come? Am I somehow misunderstanding the chart? If not, I think these numbers are very interesting. Even if the numbers are obviously a lot lower on the Jaina and Persephone compared to the top tiers, but if a character is bad a character is bad, even it has dedicated good players playing them - especially since there should also be dedicated good players playing the good players as well, right? There might be a higher number of not-so-good players just picking top tier characters and losing with them, but then again, if a top tier is a top tier, they should end up getting more wins just because of the fact that they are a top tier.
What are your thoughts about it @mysticjuicer - excell spreadsheet extraordinaire, am I not understanding these numbers? Am I misusing them?


at which point, the chart confirm the perceived tiers pretty well. But they are still within a good enough margin to make them all fairly balanced. No character either wins or loses more than 5.6 -4.4 of their matches. Not that that excludes the game from having worse matchups of course, but it is still pretty cool ^^